Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Vincent Wilson v. Deputy Queen
as 23-6649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY QUEEN, DEPUTY HARA, DEPUTY BURROWS and others
Vincent Wilson v. Deputy Queen
as 23-6572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY QUEEN, DEPUTY HARA, DEPUTY BURROWS and others
Carter v. Stith et al
as 1:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Lt. Knight, A Sykes, Miranda Stith and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravely v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv02031
Defendant:
Scott D. Shellenberger, State of Maryland, Perry Wasserman and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Gravely, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sirleaf v. Amor Correctional Health Service$ Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Doctor Gore, Lynda Burrows, Does 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf et al v. Northam et al
as 3:2019cv00712
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Ralph Northam, Lynda Burrows and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Israel and Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf v. Clarke et al
as 3:2019cv00710
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Captain Wright, D.Y. Kinsley and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf et al v. Haris et al
as 8:2019cv02380
Defendant:
Scott Haris, Jordan, Barbara Mikeljohn and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Israel and Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sirleaf et al v. Northam et al
as 8:2019cv02376
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Ralph Northam, Lynda Burrows and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Israel and Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sirleaf v. Amor Correctional Health Service$ Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02377
Defendant:
Doctor Gore, Lynda Burrows, Does 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
