Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Casper v. USA
as 3:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
John M. Casper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Joel Burrell v. D. Shirley
as 23-6791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Med Tech, SCADD, Correctional Officer and others
Casper v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Casper, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joel Burrell v. William Anderson
as 22-6950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent, DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous), CHRIS WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous) and others
Joel Burrell v. William Anderson
as 22-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent, DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous), CHRIS WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous) and others
Burrell v. Shirley et al
as 1:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
D. Shirley, Jane Doe, Scadd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Hodge et al
as 1:2021cv00876
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Barrell and Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
Jessica Hodge, P. West Brook-Scott, Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Lt. "John" Ward
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Sgt. "John" Casper, Lt. "John" Ward, Captain(s) "John Does" and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eichel v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Eichel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Markese Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
