Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Walker v. Officer Chan et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Defendant:
Officer Chan and Lt. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elyas v. Chan
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Sameer Mohamed Elyas
Defendant:
Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 7:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Davis v. Chia Wang
as 22-6045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY D. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIA CHAN WANG, GLORIA HARVEY and NC DPS
Davis v. Wang et al
as 5:2021ct03210
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Davis
Defendant:
Chia Chan Wang, Gloria Harvey and NC DPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv00498
Respondent:
Paul Perry and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Tzoy-Chan Miguel Alejandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Somchai Noonsab v. USDC EDNC
as 16-7430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, W. BROWN, STEPHEN M. RUSSELL and others
Noonsab v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
as 5:2016ct03112
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, W. T. Brown, Stephen Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyon Riddick v. Herlock
as 13-6194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEYON RIDDICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HERLOCK, Mr. Director of Security, JO HONG, Correctional Officer and FAUX, Mr. Correctional Officer
Defendant:
CHAN, Correctional Officer, JUSTICE, Correctional Officer, WITTAKER, Correctional Officer/Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
