Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dauda v. Lewis et al
as 8:2018cv01886
Plaintiff:
Ishmail Dauda
Defendant:
Ciara Lewis, Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Johnson v. Pierce
as 16-6142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALEN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE, Deputy Sheriff and CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, Nurses/Provider
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, Sheriff Department
Reese v. Stolle et al
as 2:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Conmed Healthcare Management Inc. and Naph Care Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., John Harler, Dayna Vango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
James Alen Johnson
Defendant:
Pierce, Newport News City Jail and Conmed Healthcare Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAdoo v. Jamaludeen et al
as 2:2014cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee McAdoo
Defendant:
A. Jamaludeen and CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pardee v. ConMed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00703
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Pardee, Jr.
Defendant:
ConMed Healthcare Management, Inc., Kenneth Stolle and T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Conmed Healthcare Managment Inc.
as 1:2012cv03249
Plaintiff:
Jay R. Harding, Sr.
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Managment Inc., Paul Daniel Miller, Donna Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Wicomico County Corr. Center et al
as 1:2012cv02562
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Curtis
Defendant:
Wicomico County Corr. Center, Kalouromakis, Conmed Healthcare Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
