Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7396
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kreis v. Ross et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00344
Plaintiff: August B. Kreis, III
Defendant: David Ross, David Johnson, Van Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Shoe Hut Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01040
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: Shoe Hut Inc, Unknown Female and Ins Bond Carrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv04461
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Julian Rochester v. Bull Street State Hospital
as 12-7476
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, a/k/a Julian Edward Rochester, on behalf of Melaney Johnston deceased victim
Defendant - Appellee: BULL STREET STATE HOSPITAL, Its New Owners, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, TOWN OF SENECA and others
Rochester v. Bull Street Hospital et al
as 8:2011cv02180
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: Bull Street State Hospital, State of South Carolina, Seneca, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Riches v. Norcees Carrier
as 08-7325
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff: JONES LANG LASALLE, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: NORCEES BEN CARRIER and HOLLIS EARL ROBERTS
Riches et al v. Carrier et al
as 2:2008cv00031
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches, Jones Lang Lasalle and all others similarly situated
Defendant: Norcees Ben Carrier and Hollis Earl Roberts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkinson v. Finch et al
as 5:2007ct03016
Plaintiff: Michael Scott Perkinson
Defendant: Deborah W. Finch, T. W. Parrish, Patricia L. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?