Cases 1 - 10 of 3,013
Pierce v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv03574
Plaintiff:
Thomas Giniski Pierce
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Marable, Jr. v. Mecklenburg Circuit Court
as 24-6591
Petitioner:
WILLIAM I. MARABLE, JR.
Respondent:
MECKLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Derek Sprouse v. Virginia Director of Prisons
as 24-6583
Petitioner:
DEREK SPROUSE
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, Department of Corrections
Corey Johnson v. A. Walker
as 24-6584
Plaintiff:
COREY E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
A. WALKER, MR. BELL, R. LANGFORD and others
Reid v. Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamie Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6564
Plaintiff:
JAMIE GOSS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAVERN COHEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
James Rose v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6556
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROSE
Defendant:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Sherisse Birch and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
