Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wedsted v. Unknown We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00241
Plaintiff: David Ray Wedsted
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tant v. Frick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv03001
Plaintiff: David Ray Tant
Defendant: William Frick , South Carolina Office of the Attorney General , South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. David Roy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7406
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Roy v. USA
as 3:2014cv00602
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: David Ray Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2014cv00194
Petitioner: David Ray Smith
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tant v. Frick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03020
Plaintiff: David Ray Tant
Defendant: William Frick , Michael Stobbe , David Tatarsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. David Roy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6566
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Roy v. USA
as 3:2012cv00182
Petitioner: David Ray Roy
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. David Roy
as 11-7551
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Barbour v. Canterburg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00579
Plaintiff: David Ray Barbour
Defendant: Lt. Canterburg and Lt. Morani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?