Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 5:2024ct03113
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Dorsett, et al
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Brown
Defendant:
Captain Dorsett, Officer Jarmon and Garry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Gerald Hopper v. Garry McFadden
as 24-6050
Plaintiff:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant:
GARRY L. MCFADDEN, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County, In his official capacity, MARY LEBLISS, Medical Doctor, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity, DESTINY WALTERS, Physician Assistant, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity and others
Yarborough v. Waddell
as 5:2023hc02279
Petitioner:
Garry Artis Yarborough
Respondent:
Stephen Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Franklin A. Morris
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Terrell T. Howard
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
Garry Hawley
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawley v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
Garry Hawley
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
