Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Robert Frazier v. Prince Georges County
as 24-1380
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Williams et al v. The Beaufort County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
Ivory Williams, Topaz Williams-Fripp and Ivory Williams as Guardian of R.F., a Minor
Defendant:
The Beaufort County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Sheriff William Grey, Sergeant Troy Krapf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tarun Vyas v. Stephen Sofinski
as 23-6561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN R. SOFINSKI, DEREK WHETZHEL, SHERON ASHBY and others
Robert Frazier v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNELL DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, LESLIE SHARP, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ELMER LAGUAN-SALINAS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Defendant:
LAKEECIA RENEE ALLEN, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, BRYON BEREANO, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, JOHN BIELEC, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County and others
Vyas v. Sofinski et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Defendant:
Stephen R. Sofinski, Derek Whetzhel, Sheron Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lose, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert William Lose, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Stephens, West Virginia Deparment of Human Health and Resources, Guardian ad litem Kristen Antolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 11-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., and as next best friend J.F.D.a minor child
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as governor of the State of North Carlolina, MELANIE A. SHEKITA, individually and in her official capacity as assistant district attorney, Wake County, North Carolina and others
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-7398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
