Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Hinton v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03155
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Edward F. Basden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2024ct03088
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Josh Stein and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. United States Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Charles E. Hinton
Respondent:
United States Incorporated, Roy A. Cooper, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Biden
as 5:2023ct03343
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
