Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ronnie Whitener v. John Patterson
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
RONNIE DALE WHITENER
Defendant:
JOHN PATTERSON, RCDC Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN COOLEY, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity, JOSHUA GOODWIN, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity and others
Roberson v. Tuomey Healthcare Systems et al
as 2:2023cv04493
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Roberson
Defendant:
Tuomey Healthcare Systems, Doctor Paul A. Evangelisti, S.C.D. Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Warden Barnes, FCI Bennetsville
as 8:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brown
Defendant:
Warden Barnes, FCI Bennetsville, Nanette F. Barnes, Rufus C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Simmons v. Shelley Stoke
as 12-7322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROLAND MCFADDEN, Warden, ROBIN CHAVIS, AMY SMITH, RN Nurse and others
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, ROBERT SCHULZE, JR., MD, JENNIFER A. FELDMAN, MD and others
Simmons v. Stokes et al
as 8:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Shelly Stokes, Roland McFadden, Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Stokes et al
as 2:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Shelly Stokes, Roland McFadden, Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center et al
as 9:2008cv01570
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jay Wall
Defendant:
Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center, Simon Major, Jr, SLRDC Officers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
