Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff et al
as 9:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin
Defendant:
Daniel Harouff, Michael McCall, AEDEC International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jonathan Riches v. Jan-Pro Franchising Internatio
as 08-7484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL INC. and WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Riches v. Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01203
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Hard Rock Cafe International Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Hard Rock Cafe International Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. UHaul International Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01354
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
UHaul International Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Chiquita Brands International Inc et al
as 7:2008cv00168
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Chiquita Brands International Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Quattlebaum et al
as 0:2007cv03644
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Esther Quattlebaum, Jon E Ozmint, Robert E Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Riches v. Blackwater USA, et al
as 7:2007cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Blackwater USA, Blackwater Security Consulting Inc, Blackwater Lodge and Training Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
