Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bakha Yawuti El v. City of Myrtle Beach
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKHA YAWUTI EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GIOSA and others
John Hudson v. Fredrick Shaw
as 23-6391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK SHAW
Hudson v. Biancardi et al
as 5:2022ct03445
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Rosemary E. Biancardi, Cory D. Collins, Timothy Vigus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levon Spaulding v. USDC
as 22-7313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVON SPAULDING, a/k/a John Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Raleigh, North Carolina
Hudson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2022ct03361
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Sgt. Fredrick Shaw, Corey D. Collins, Brenda J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03338
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Glenda Jackson, Shana Henderson, Unit Manager Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Shaw
as 5:2022ct03313
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Fredrick Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. United States District Court
as 5:2022ct03290
Plaintiff:
Levon Spaulding and John Scott
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
