Cases 1 - 10 of 889
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, DULA, Correction Officer, COX, Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonita v. U.S.P-Lee employees et al
as 7:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Bonita
Defendant:
U.S.P-Lee employees, C/O Hamilton, Correctional Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Rosado, Jr. v. Joshua Barnes
as 23-6340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS ANTONIO ROSADO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA BARNES, QUAMANYNE M. JOHNSON, LARRY GRIER and others
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FLEMMINGS, ERIC RIGGS and DA'SHONE JOYNER
Johnson v. Fleeman et al
as 7:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Percy M. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Major Fleeman, Sgt. Anders and P. A. Linkous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Derrell Johnson
Defendant:
Shawn Carter, Marey Capitol Firm, Beyonce Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Derrell T. Johnson
Defendant:
Shawn C. Carter, Shakia M. Johnson and Alesha Evant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6347
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREN M. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
