Cases 1 - 10 of 26
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Peaks v. Ganoe
as 23-6518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE PEAKS
Defendant / Appellee:
GANOE, Correctional Officer
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Peak v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv03103
Defendant:
Wyane Hill, Maryland Division of Corrections, Robert Green and others
Plaintiff:
Djimond Peak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE
as 1:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. US
as 22-6488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGES and others
Peaks v. MCTC Warden et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Peaks
Defendant:
MCTC Warden, Ganoe and Robin Woolford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
