Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lamar Cannady v. Matthew Schofield
as 23-7111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR CANNADY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW SCHOFIELD, Public Defender, in his individual and official capacity, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE-ADVOCATE OFFICE, County of Polk, in its official capacity, COUNTY OF POLK, State of North Carolina funded, in its official capacity and others
Cannady v. Polk County Sheriff Dep et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Lamar Cannady
Respondent:
Polk County Sheriff Dep and Timothy Wright
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamar Cannady v. Timothy Wright
as 23-6258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR CANNADY
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WRIGHT, CALEB EDWARDS, POLK COUNTY DETENTION OFFICER CASE and others
Cannady v. Polk County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Rutherford County SBI, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Damon Mandell Mobley
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department, Caleb Edwards and Polk County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Spartanburg County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 7:2021cv00525
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Dept, Cole Weicker, J Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. Polk County Jail
as 1:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Charles Shawn Gary
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Polk County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00270
Petitioner:
Johnny F. Godfrey
Respondent:
Polk County Sheriffs Dept. and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
