Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. Gomez
as 0:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
Brian Spann
Defendant:
Christophe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Spann v. Warden Jackson et al
as 8:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Spann and Eric L Spann
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Associate Warden Tisdale, Captain Captain Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Spann-Mitchell v. Sheriff Kristin Graziano
as 0:2021cv03153
Petitioner:
Marquez Mitchell-Spann and Marquez Spann-Mitchell
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Warden, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spann v. Williams
as 8:2021cv00892
Petitioner:
Touriarnold Spann
Respondent:
C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burchett v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020ct03010
Defendant:
Nurse Wilson, Nurse Mercer, Nurse Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Cole Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deaton v. Volkswagon Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv03078
Defendant:
Volkswagon Corporation, Joshua Spann, Lexington County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
William Harper Deaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Schafer et al
as 2:2018cv01778
Defendant:
Columbia Regional Care Center, Heinz Peter Schafer and Kelly LNU
Plaintiff:
Labar Spann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Perry et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Defendant:
Frank Perry, George T. Solomon, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
