Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Johnson v. Stolle
as 1:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Jerome B. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marl v. Stolle et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Bryce Marl
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Abdul Jamaludeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherwood v. Stolle et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jason Brooks Sherwood
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Summit Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherwood v. Stolle et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jason Sherwood
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Summit Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Stolle et al
as 1:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Cecil R. Lewis
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Thompson and Holk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Stolle et al
as 3:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
William Henry Harrington, III
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Nursing Department and Dr. J
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jazz Estell El v. City of Greensboro, N.C.
as 22-1790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIEF JAZZ ELYSE ESTELL EL, ex rel. Danette Elyse Whitaker
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, CHIEF BRIAN JAMES, acting in his official capacity and individual capacity, OFFICER ANDREW MULDOWNEY, acting in his official capacity as a CITY OF GREENSBORO, N.C. officer and individual capacity and others
Mahler v. Stolle et al
as 1:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Elihue Martin Mahler
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Collin Stolle and Andrew Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braun v. Stolle
as 1:2022cv00612
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan Braun
Respondent:
Sheriff Stolle and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voliva v. Stolle, et al.
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Anthony Voliva
Defendant:
Unknown and Ken Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
