Cases 1 - 10 of 1,680
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02119
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Edwards v. Buffaloe, Jr. et al
as 5:2024ct03149
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 5:2024ct03146
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Williams, III
Defendant:
Dr. David White, Department of Adult Correction and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Kenneth
as 5:2024ct03145
Plaintiff:
Darnell William King
Defendant:
Kay Kenneth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI
Respondent:
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
USA and TEXAS, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
