Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Gamache v. The State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff: Gregory Gamache
Defendant: The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. $206,245.99 Seized from a Mainstreet Bank Account with an account number ending in "2895" in the name of Maximum Deals, Inc., at Mainstreet Bank, 4029 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, Virgin et al
as 1:2010cv01425
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $206,245.99 Seized from a Mainstreet Bank Acct with an acct number ending in "2895" in the name of Maximum Deals, Inc., at Mainstreet Bank, 4029 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, Virginia, $74,987.93 Seized from a TD Bank Account with an account number ending in "6382" in the name of Maximum Deals, Inc., at TD Bank, 9800 Liberia Avenue, Manassas, Virginia, $7,813.52 Seized from a TD Bank Acct with an acct number ending in "5551" in the name of Univision Auto, LLC, t/a Auto Trademark, at TD Bank, 9800 Liberia Avenue, Manassas, Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5317
United States of America v. $49,838.68 SEIZED FROM A TD BANK ACCOUNT
as 1:2010cv01344
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $49,838.68 SEIZED FROM A TD BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING IN "0231" IN THE NAME OF MANASSAS PARK PETROLEUM LLC AT TD BANK, 557 SOUTH VAN DORN STREET ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5317
United States Of America v. 43558 Firestone Place, Leesburg, Virginia
as 1:2010cv01332
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: 43558 Firestone Place, Leesburg, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
US v. State of Oregon, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Petitioner: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant: TERENCE PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGE CHEMALI and CLP, INCORPORATED
United States Of America v. Eleven Firearms et al
as 7:2010cv00352
Defendant: Approximately $17,955.57 in lieu of Certain real property known as 6706 Quail Place, Roanoke, Virginia and Eleven Firearms
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $475,823.75, More or Less, In United States Currency, et al
as 2:2010cv01007
Interested Party: Myra C. Miller and John J. Miller
Defendant: Two Real Properties in West Virginia, $475,823.75, More or Less, In United States Currency and One Real Property In Kentucky
Intervenor: Henry Vinson, Thirty-Five Third Ave., LLC and Vinsonian Investments, LLC
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Real Properties Situated at 105 Graff Lane, Quarry Creek, Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00992
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Properties Situated at 105 Graff Lane, Quarry Creek, Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia and 1998 Parkwood Road, Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Two Hummer Limousines and Real Property Situated at 24 Stonegate Drive, Hurricane, Putnam County, West Virginia, Together With All Improvements Thereon and Appurtenances Thereto
as 2:2010cv00851
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Two Hummer Limousines and Real Property Situated at 24 Stonegate Drive, Hurricane, Putnam County, West Virginia, Together With All Improvements Thereon and Appurtenances Thereto
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. 22927 Foxcroft Road, Middleburg, Virginia
as 1:2010cv00351
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 22927 Foxcroft Road, Middleburg, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?