Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martinez v. Grill Kabob Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00881
Plaintiff:
Pedro A. Martinez
Defendant:
Grill Kabob Express, Inc., Grill Kabob of Montgomery, Inc., Omar Shoja and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kaba et al v. American Eagle Express, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Abdourahaman Kaba and Dieudonne Kabore
Defendant:
American Eagle Express, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
American Eagle Express, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Abdourahaman Kaba and Dieudonne Kabore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VELASQUEZ MONTERROSA v. MI Casita Restaurante Mexicano et al
as 5:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
MOISES ENOT VELASQUEZ MONTERROSA
Defendant:
Mi Casita Restaurants , Juan M. Macias , Jesus Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez et al v. Global Express Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alvin Rodriguez , Jesus Gomez and Jose Vallejo
Defendant:
Global Express Inc. , Petros D. Demetriou and Bruno Cardozo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Averitt Express Inc et al
as 7:2013cv03055
Plaintiff:
Stanley H Davis
Defendant:
Averitt Express Inc and Averitt Express Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Vargas v. AKI Express, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv03316
Plaintiff:
Emilia Vargas
Defendant:
AKI Express, Inc. and AKI Express USA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kevin Gadson v. Shuttle Express, Inc.
as 11-1445
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN A. GADSON, OKIERIETA O. ENAJEKPO and SAMUEL D. MURIITHI
Defendant - Appellant:
SHUTTLE EXPRESS, INC.
Defendant:
SUPERSHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., SHUTTLE EXPRESS CORPORATION, VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED and others
Bryant v. Abilene Motor Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bryant
Defendant:
Abilene Motor Express, Inc., U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Medcost Benefit Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
