Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KEY v. MOBLE LINK (N.C.), LLC
as 1:2020cv01051
Defendant:
MOBLE LINK (N.C.), LLC and MOBILELINK NORTH CAROLINA LLC
Plaintiff:
MELANIE A. KEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hernandez v. Mobile Link (N.C.) LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00504
Defendant:
Mobilelink North Carolina LLC and Mobile Link (N.C.) LLC
Plaintiff:
Luz Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez-Lopez v. National Delivery Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00502
Defendant:
National Delivery Systems, Inc., Human Link Staffing, LLC, Santi Staffing Solution, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez-Lopez
Sanchez-Lopez v. National Delivery Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Defendant:
National Delivery Systems, Inc., Human Link Staffing, LLC, Santi Staffing Solution, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez-Lopez
Benavides Segovia v. Car Links Auto Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02455
Plaintiff:
Henry Jeovan Benavides Segovia
Defendant:
Car Links Auto Group, LLC and Stephen C. Kalu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Decalo Medical Group, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Decalo Medical Group, LLC, John Aziz and Yvonne Linke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bonds v. Wigo Clinic LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bonds
Defendant:
Wigo Clinic LLC and Sheri Link
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 355 Retirement Pension Plan v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00541
Plaintiff:
Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 355 Retirement Pension Plan
Defendant:
Charles E. Davis, Jr. and Sherrie A. Link
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Buchanan et al v. Waste Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02863
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Buchanan, Gilbert Buchanan, Shawn Daugherty and others
Defendant:
Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
