Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sandoval v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00447
Plaintiff:
Susan G. Sandoval
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Campbell v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 7:2013cv02638
Plaintiff:
Robert H Campbell
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Thomas Kulish v. Rite Aid Corporation and Ecker
as 13-1044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS B. KULISH, On behalf of himself and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees
Defendant - Appellee:
RITE AID CORPORATION AND ECKERD CORPORATION, d/b/a Rite Aid and RITE AID OF MARYLAND, d/b/a Rite Aid
James Fisher v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 12-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FISHER, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
RITE AID CORPORATION and ECKERD CORPORATION, d/b/a Rite Aid
Kulish v. Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
as 1:2011cv03178
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Kulish
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation and Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Self Regional Healthcare v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 8:2011cv01447
Plaintiff:
Self Regional Healthcare
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Corporation Master Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Fisher v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fisher v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
James S Fisher
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reece v. Eckerd Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv03558
Plaintiff:
Edward L Reece, III
Defendant:
Eckerd Corporation and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
