Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rodgers v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Taryechia Rodgers
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc. doing business as Nestle USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodgers v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2017cv03230
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rodgers
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rodgers-Foster v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2017cv00599
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rodgers-Foster
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chado et al v. National Auto Inspections, LLC
as 1:2017cv02945
Plaintiff:
William Rush, Ian Chado, Nancy Nguyen and others
Defendant:
National Auto Inspections, LLC, Jason Goldsmith and Carchex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Duncan v. Rodgers et al
as 8:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duncan
Defendant:
George E Rodgers, Jr., RBS Maryland, LLC and Rodgers Brothers Custodial Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Duncan v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duncan
Defendant:
George E Rodgers, Jr., RBS Maryland, LLC and Rodgers Brothers Custodial Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodgers et al v. Abbster Enterprises LLC
as 3:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodgers and Lauren Collins
Defendant:
Abbster Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chehi v. Allegheny Dimension, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Robert Chehi
Defendant:
Allegheny Dimension, LLC, John W. Crites, II, Allegheny Wood Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. F. Rodgers Corporation
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund
Defendant:
F. Rodgers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mendes v. JM Rodgers Co Inc
as 6:2011cv03435
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Mendes
Defendant:
JM Rodgers Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
