Cases 101 - 110 of 163
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 3:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Objector:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Vollmer v. General Electric Company et al
as 5:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Deborah Vollmer
Defendant:
General Electric Company , General Electric International, Inc. , General Electric Global Growth and Operations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shorter v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2012cv02324
Plaintiff:
Alice Dawn Shorter
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esposito v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Maria Esposito
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Titus v. Smith et al
as 5:2012cv00061
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Michael Smith, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Scott Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Trudy R. Pierce
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Titus v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Scott Titus
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jr. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deabreu et al v. Novastar Home Morgage, Incorporated et al
as 8:2011cv03692
Plaintiff:
Louis Pierre Deabreu and Renee Lavinia Deabreu
Defendant:
Novastar Home Morgage, Incorporated, Michigan Fidelity Acceptance Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2011cv00753
Plaintiff:
Joyce L. Tyler
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
