Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Ronald Satish Emrit v. Barbara Cegavske
as 17-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA CEGAVSKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEVADA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Holland & Knight, LLP
as 17-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP, D.C. BAR, ON THE POTOMAC PRODUCTIONS and others
Ronald Satish Emrit v. Continuum Legal
as 17-1230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINUUM LEGAL, CACI, INCORPORATED, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emrit v. Holland & Knight, LLP. et al
as 8:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Holland & Knight, LLP., D.C. Bar, On The Potomac Productions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Cegavske et al
as 8:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Barbara Cegavske, Secretary of State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) et al
as 8:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Maryland Motor Vehicles Administration (MVA) and U.S. Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Continuum Legal et al
as 1:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Continuum Legal , CACI, Inc., United States Department of Energy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
