Cases 111 - 120 of 343
Roberts v. Holbrook et al
as 3:2020cv00956
Defendant:
Sheriff Leon Lott, Columbia, City of, Richland County and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillian v. Richland County Solicitor's Office
as 0:2019cv03298
Petitioner:
Steven Bossell Gillian and Temo
Respondent:
Richland County Solicitor's Office and Warden, Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Shakara Murphy v. Benjamin Fields
as 19-2322
Defendant:
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FIELDS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHAKARA MURPHY
Gilmore v. Family Court of Richland County et al
as 1:2019cv02696
Petitioner:
Tyganda Gilmore
Respondent:
Family Court of Richland County, Social Services for Child Services, Richland County E.TC, Richland County Sheriffs dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
English et al v. Clarke et al
as 3:2019cv02491
Plaintiff:
Kewon English and Earl Powell
Defendant:
Joseph Clarke, Richland County Sheriff's Department and Leon Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Harriot v. DOJ
as 19-7344
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WAIZENHOFFER, FBI Special Agent, SCARLETT A. WILSON, Former AUSA, STACEY DENISE HAYNES, AUSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
