Cases 11 - 20 of 199
Davis v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Bradley Ray Davis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association v. Advanced Home Inspection, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association doing business as U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
Defendant:
Advanced Home Inspection, LLC and Bradley Gamlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Craig Robertson Construction, Inc. v. Bradley
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Craig Robertson Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew C. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bowers v. Hoag et al
as 7:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Bowers
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, MJR O'dell and Lisa Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hodges v. Henrico Police Department, et al.
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Bradley Randall Hill, Alan Thomas Richardson and Henrico Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Taylor v. LCC Captian
as 2:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Bradley L. Taylor
Defendant:
LCC Captian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Trinity Food Service Group
as 7:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jerry Orlando Bradley
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
