Cases 11 - 20 of 20
DeFour v. Northam et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, James Parks, Ralph Northam and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. Brian Moran
as 21-6258
Defendant / Appellee:
G. HOLLOWAY, Regional Administrator, BRIAN MORAN, Secretary of Public Safety and DAVID A. ROBINSON, Deputy Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK E. BROWN
Brown v. Moran et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
J. Barry, Christopher J. Gensinger, T. Watkin and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leo Farnsworth v. Melvin Davis
as 20-7686
Defendant / Appellee:
MELVIN DAVIS, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC, BRIAN MORAN, Director/Superintendent of Public Safety for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEO BRANDON FARNSWORTH
Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Frankie M. Miller, Jr. and Frankie Miller-El
Defendant:
Jeff L. Everhart, Michael P. Mullen, Margaret W. Deglau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodfin v. Bennett, et al.
as 3:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Adrianna L. Bennett, Brian Moran and Ralph Northern
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Woodfin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. Duffy Box & Recycling, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Barbara Boone
Defendant:
Duffy Box & Recycling, Inc. , Brian Moran , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 3:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
David S. Goldstein
Defendant:
John Marshall, Terry McAuliff, Brian Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldstein v. Moran et al
as 3:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
David Goldstein
Defendant:
Brian Moran and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuttleworth v. Moran et al
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Bruce Shuttleworth
Defendant:
Brian Moran and Margo Horner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
