Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Charles King, III v. Todd Strohman
as 16-6258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIAM KING, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE TODD STROHMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Strohman
as 1:2015cv02642
Petitioner:
Charles William King, III
Respondent:
Todd Strohman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Baltimore City State's Attorney Office
as 1:2015cv01773
Plaintiff:
Charles William King
Defendant:
Baltimore City State's Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Charles J. King
as 14-6838
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JERMAINE KING, JR., a/k/a Zig-Lah, a/k/a Ziggy, a/k/a Charles Jermaine King, Jr.
King v. USA
as 1:2012cv80492
Petitioner:
Charles Jermaine King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. King et al
as 7:2011cv00411
Defendant:
Joan E. Gnegy, Charles Patrick King and The Estate of Ann Gnegy King
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
King v. DeBoo
as 2:2011cv00050
Petitioner:
Charles Jermaine King
Respondent:
Kuma J. DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09740
Plaintiff:
Charles F. King, Sr.
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Old Orchard Industrial Corp. and Vapor, A Brunswick Company
Cross_defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Charles King
as 09-5004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JERMAINE KING, JR., a/k/a Zig-Lah, a/k/a Ziggy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
