Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Miles v. State of Maryland
as 1:2018cv03818
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Petitioner:
Kelvin J. Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Miles v. Harry Hughe
as 17-6979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY HUGHES, Governor of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity, MARK A. LEVINE, former Maryland Commissioner of the Division of Correction, in his official capacity, JOSEPH D. EGEBERG, State Jail Programming & Inspection Officer, in his individual and official capacities and others
Miles v. Lanham et al
as 3:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Richard L. Lanham and E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelvin Miles v. Richard Lanham
as 16-7703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD L. LANHAM, Senior Deputy U.S. Marshall and E. C. WILSON, Warden
Kelvin Miles v. Medical Service
as 16-6950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDICAL SERVICES and ABAYOMI ADEYINKA
Kelvin Miles v. Richard Lanham
as 16-6721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD L. LANHAM, Senior Deputy U.S. Marshall and E. C. WILSON, Warden
Miles v. Lanham et al
as 3:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Richard L. Lanham and E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelvin J. Miles v. J. Glen
as 15-7282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES, a/k/a Kelvin Jerome Miles
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMANDER J. GLEN, EDWARD READ, Health Care Doctor, LT TAMDA MIDDLETON and others
Miles et al v. Hochuli, M.D. et al
as 1:2015cv01591
Plaintiff:
Colleen J Miles and Kevin Miles
Defendant:
Stephan U. Hochuli, M.D. and Carroll Hospital Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
