Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Edwards v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2020cv00397
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Officer FNU Blount, John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Tishawn Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith Rangel Consulting, LLC v. John Doe(s)
as 1:2019cv01577
Plaintiff:
Smith Rangel Consulting, LLC and Mattox Global
Defendant:
John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Obama et al
as 1:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Barack Obama, John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
John Louis Freeman, Sr.
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Kenneth W. Stolle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Taylor et al v. First Colony Life Insurance et al
as 1:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor and Gail Taylor
Defendant:
First Colony Life Insurance and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Pender & Coward et al
as 2:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
Vivian A. Anderson
Defendant:
Pender & Coward, Richard H. Matthews, Esq., Breeden, Salb, Breasley, & Duvall, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 145
Octave v. Wade et al
as 3:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gloria Juanita Octave
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade, Augustus Edwards, Sara Tolentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mya Saray, LLC v. Sahni's Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mya Saray, LLC
Defendant:
Sahni's Enterprises, Inc. , #1 Wholesale, LLC , The Hookah Hookup and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
