Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Thomas v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
Mary Thomas
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camden v. Greenville, City of et al
as 6:2014cv04554
Plaintiff:
Steven Blair Camden
Defendant:
Greenville, City of, Greenville Police Department, Officer Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17951
Plaintiff:
Linda Marie Thomas and Frederick Leon Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Neomedic, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10694
Plaintiff:
Eugenie Marie Thomas
Defendant:
Neomedic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2014md02511
Plaintiff:
Tamatha Dickerson (WVSD CA 2:14-10693) , Eugenie Marie Thomas (WVSD CA 2:14-10694) , Tina Carpenter (WVSD CA 2:14-10721) and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv06724
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09446
Plaintiff:
Mary Thomas and Mike Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01370
Plaintiff:
Mary Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
