Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Jeremy Arsenio Smith
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Dashawn Tyreek Dixon
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stum v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Terrance M. Stum
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Hammons v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Meyers v. Angela Wethington
as 21-7699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA WETHINGTON, PREA Manager-Oerations Manager, HARVEY SPENCER, SXI-Chief Secretary, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Eastern Regional Operations Manager and others
Adam Pelletier v. Marcus Elam
as 21-7043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM PELLETIER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, BETH CABEL, Warden Sussex II and MR. BROWN, Hearing Officer for Sussex II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
