Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Fedynich v. Shaw et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Defendant:
Yvonne Farmer, Anton Shaw, Vonnie and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fedynich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Neal v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Daishawn Neal and Hamza Abjullaah Nassir Neal
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Neal et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Neal and Abingdon Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael C. Neal and Cynthia Ann Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adugna v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
Bereket Adugna
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, David L. Neal, David H. Wetmore and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Orlando v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Orlando
Defendant:
Sheriff Donald L. Smith, Major Brian Jenkins, Bristol Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00549
Petitioner:
Dai Shawn M. Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolden v. Youngkin et al
as 7:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Neal Bolden
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares, Todd Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Tillman et al
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Christian Alexander Neal
Defendant:
Officer M. Tillman, Nurse Bailey, Nurse Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
