Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Tinsley v. USA
as 1:2012cv00186
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael M. Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard v. Liberty University et al
as 6:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Howard
Defendant:
Liberty University, Officer Craig Sasser and Officer Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minnis et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Gary Minnis, Larry More, David Richardson and others
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Fred Schilling, Robin Hulbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tinsley v. Astrue
as 7:2009cv00427
Plaintiff:
Wanda U. Tinsley
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tinsley v. The United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 6:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Gracie Tinsley
Defendant:
The United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, The United States of America, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Commonwealth of Virginia, University of Virginia Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
Tinsley v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00407
Petitioner:
Edward James Tinsley
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis Daryle Tinsley v. USA
as 4:2009cv80142
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Daryle Tinsley
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Newton v. Washington et al
as 1:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jay Newton
Defendant:
G. K. Washington, D. M. Vaughan, S.A. Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tinsley v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 2:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tinsley
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America, Mr. Mayo, Mrs. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
