Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
William Orr v. U.S. EPA
as 21-1222
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, JEFF LOVEN, Personally and as General Manager, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM ORR
Appalachian Voices v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2159
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, CINDY SCHULZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Petitioner: INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, PRESERVE GILES COUNTY, WILD VIRGINIA and others
Nelson v. United States Of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00776
Defendant: The National Park Service, United States Of America and The United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff: Marie Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wild Virginia, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
as 19-1866
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, CINDY SCHULZ, in her official capacity as Field Supervisor, Virginia Ecological Services, Responsible Official and others
Humane Society of the US v. US Fish and Wildlife Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1678
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, BORN FREE USA and others
Sierra Club v. National Park Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1082
Petitioner: SIERRA CLUB and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE
Respondent: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior, RYAN ZINKE, in his official capacity Secretary of the Department of the Interior, MICHAEL T. REYNOLDS, in his official capacity as Deputy Director, Operations, Exercising the Authority of Director and others
Intervenor: ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE LLC
National Council for Adoption v. Sally Jewell
as 16-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION and BUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIES, on behalf of itself and its birth-parent clients
Plaintiff: D. V., Birth Parent, N. L., Birth Parent and T. W., baby boy, by and through his guardian ad litem Philip (Jay) McCarthy, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, KEVIN WASHBURN, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
National Council for Adoption et al v. Jewell et al
as 1:2015cv00675
Plaintiff: National Council for Adoption , Building Arizona Families , D.V. and others
Defendant: Sally Jewell, Kevin Washburn, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Coal River Mountain Watch v. United States Department of the Interior We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv26251
Plaintiff: Coal River Mountain Watch
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior , Sally Jewell , Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Patock v. Fox News television channel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00974
Plaintiff: James Patock
Defendant: Fox News television channel, Channel 12 News television channel, Channel 12 News television channel reporter William Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?