Cases 191 - 200 of 87,753
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Ellison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Zonta Tavarus Ellison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant:
CHUM HARRISON, FNU WOODARD, FNU NEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
