Cases 21 - 30 of 137
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Sherwood et al
as 7:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
Sherwood, M. Breniger, May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Gilberetta May Carter
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Drayton v. Newman et al
as 7:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Drayton
Defendant:
Sgt. Newman, S. M. Snead, J. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
May et al v. M.R. Associates, L.P.
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Caroline May, Benjamin Matthew-Blake Hall, Caroline Hall and others
Defendant:
M.R. Associates, L.P. and Stacy West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
May v. Buttigieg
as 1:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Jackquline A May
Defendant:
Pete Buttigieg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drayton v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Lamont Darnel Drayton
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Sgt. Newman, Lt. HM May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strebe v. Hicks et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Defendant:
D. Hicks, M. Robinson, D. Slaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
