Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv03534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv03458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Gosnell v. BMW Manufacturing Co LLC et al
as 7:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Gosnell
Defendant:
BMW Manufacturing Co LLC , Management Analysis & Utilization Inc and Tier One Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv04133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
AHMADI D/B/A SOUTHEAST ENTERPRISES, et al. v. TAKATA CORPORATION, et al.
as 1:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
HASSAN AHMADI doing business as SOUTHEAST ENTERPRISES and JOHN HENRY ELLIS, III
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Billingsley v. BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
as 7:2014cv04334
Plaintiff:
Larry F Billingsley
Defendant:
BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Goode v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 7:2009cv01933
Plaintiff:
Dana Goode and Dana Goode
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
