Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cherry Reaves v. Housing Authority of the City
as 11-1246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERRY REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC
USA v. 950 East 17th St., Charlotte, NC
as 3:2010mc00055
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
950 East 17th St., Charlotte, NC, Quentin Antonio McVay, Cameron Lamar McVay and others
Worley v. City of Charlotte, NC et al
as 3:2009cv00349
Petitioner:
Willie D. Worley, Jr.
Respondent:
City of Charlotte, NC and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Smereka et al
as 3:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
Victor B. White
Defendant:
FNU Smereka, FNU Taylor, FNU Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corporate Plaza Partners, LLC v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Corporate Plaza Partners, LLC and Corporate Plaza Partners, LLC
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, NC and Charlotte Regional Visitors Authority
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. City of Charlotte, NC et al
as 3:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Darnell Jones
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, NC and Judicial District 26
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benham et al v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2007cv00395
Plaintiff:
Philip Benham , Sheryl Chandler and Operation Save America, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, NC , Emily Westbrook and Keith Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. 11433 Foggy Bank Ln, Charlotte, NC
as 3:2007mc00040
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
11433 Foggy Bank Ln, Charlotte, NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
