Cases 21 - 30 of 214
In re: Raymond Chestnut
as 22-1274
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00837
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut and Ray Chestnut
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Hollywood
as 1:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chestnut
Defendant:
Officer Hollywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
US v. Southern Coal Corporation
as 22-1110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, EX REL. LUTHER STRANGE, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Alabama, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SOUTHERN COAL CORPORATION and PREMIUM COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
JUSTICE COAL OF ALABAMA, LLC, A&G COAL CORPORATION, FOUR STAR RESOURCES LLC and others
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00235
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut, Ray and others
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
In re: Raymond Chestnut
as 22-1055
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Chestnut v. Trident Health (Medical) Center C.E.O. et al
as 9:2021cv03875
Plaintiff:
Craig Latwain Chestnut
Defendant:
Trident Health (Medical) Center C.E.O., Nurse Kirstin Sutton, Jennifer R Bottoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. USA
as 4:2021cv03762
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2021cv03766
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Director Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
