Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Judd v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Will Anderson v. D. Stephen
as 10-7113
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILL ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
D. R. STEPHENS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and JOHN JOE, (DC) Trustee for the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Jihad Chase v. Terry O'Brien
as 10-7110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, WARDEN STRICKLEN, LIEUTENANT TREES and others
Roy Davis v. US
as 10-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY STEVE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden USP-Lee and others
Lewis v. Lappin
as 3:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Hazel v. Harley Lappin
as 10-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY HAZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOE DRIVER, CAPTAIN BOYLES, Administrator and others
Robert Zander v. Harley Lappin
as 10-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A. ZANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KIM WHITE, GERALDO MALDONADO, JR. and others
Smith v. Cross et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
Jahmar D. Smith
Respondent:
James N. Cross, Harley G. Lappin and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Achter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Leslie Allen Achter
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bradley Carl Brown v. Federal Bureau of Pris et al
as 10-6238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY CARL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Warden, AL HAYNES, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
