Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Thomas Boland v. Consolidated Multiple Listing
as 11-1541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BOLAND, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE, INCORPORATED, LANDMARK RESOURCES LLC, THE MUNGO COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thomas Boland v. Consolidated Multiple Listing
as 11-163
Petitioner:
THOMAS BOLAND, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Respondent:
CONSOLIDATED MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE, INC., LANDMARK RESOURCES LLC, THE MUNGO COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
RE/MAX, LLC v. Sensational Realty, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Sensational Realty, Inc. and Glen A. Frederich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. Underwood et al
as 1:2010cv02367
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Jeff Underwood and Uncommon Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. CAROLINA REALTYMAX, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
CAROLINA REALTYMAX, INC. , MAREK KUCHARSKI and NILA MACEDA KUCHARSKI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Muigai v. Re/Max United Real Estate et al
as 8:2009cv01623
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Muigai
Defendant:
Re/Max United Real Estate, IB Property Holdings, LLC and Bob Caspar
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
RE/MAX International, Inc. v. VALUE//MAX Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00436
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX International, Inc.
Defendant:
VALUE//MAX Corporation and Aster Demissie
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rossmann v. Lazarus et al
as 1:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Ronald H. Lazarus, Key Title, Old Dominion Settlements, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ryan et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02770
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ryan, Jr., Thomas E. Ryan, Jr., Paula C. Ryan and others
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., ENSR Corporation, Frall Developers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
