Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Smith v. Forrester et al
as 4:2018cv03317
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Forrester, Mr. Puritis and Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Carolina Center for Occupational Health, A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 4:2017cv02310
Petitioner:
Byron Rivers
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mills v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 0:2017cv02309
Petitioner:
Xavier M. Mills
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mixson v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 0:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Darby et al
as 4:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamar Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Darby, Dr. Randolph, Dr. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford v. Sheriff Al Cannon Det Center
as 9:2013cv03547
Plaintiff:
Michael Andre Lunsford
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Det Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 2:2013cv02707
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Brain Kellett, McDuffie County Dist Atty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, State of South Carolina Taxpayers, People of Charleston Taxpayers and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
SCDMH Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson v. Lombard et al
as 2:2011cv01468
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Defendant:
Linda Lombard, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and Charleston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
