Cases 21 - 30 of 39
US v. Dave Taylor
as 15-7407
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike
Spikes v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29424
Plaintiff:
Terri Spikes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01308
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01307
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
US v. Dave A. Taylor
as 14-6005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike
US v. Fernando Baraja
as 13-7891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO BARAJAS, a/k/a Spike
Spikes v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv02086
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Spikes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garris v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Elijah Cummings, Harry Spikes, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Spikes v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05317
Plaintiff:
Yulanda Spikes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Dave Taylor
as 12-7166
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
