Cases 31 - 40 of 420
Mills v. Lauren Beitzel et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman, Lieutenant, John G. Sindy, Case Management Specialist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Savas et al
as 2:2022cv03580
Plaintiff:
Khalil Duante Washington
Defendant:
Nina Savas, John Mullen, Roger Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Daniel Degoto v. Larry Hogan
as 22-7160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, SECRETARY ROBERT N. NEAL and others
Mills v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02452
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
R. Roderick, W. Hill, F. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hogan
as 8:2022cv02250
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Johnson, III
Defendant:
Larry Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buffkin et al v. WMK Trucking Inc et al
as 4:2022cv02852
Plaintiff:
Hogan Buffkin and Britany M Verikas
Defendant:
WMK Trucking Inc, Elkay Southern Corporation, Elkay Sales Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Daniel Degoto v. Larry Hogan
as 22-6944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN WOOLFORD, WILLIAM BOHRER, Warden, OFFICER T. LEACH and others
Mills v. Iser et al
as 1:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Major W. Iser, Lt. Thomas, Commissioner O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Vaughn Whiteman, O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
