Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Moultrie v. Progressive Direct Insurance Co
as 2:2016cv03174
Plaintiff:
Shawn Moultrie
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hargett v. Armstead et al
as 1:2016cv01739
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Hargett, Sr.
Defendant:
L. Armstead, A. Moultrie, O. Olidipa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Eagleton et al
as 4:2015cv04142
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hunt
Defendant:
Willie J Eagleton, Annie Sellers, Captain Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. McFadden
as 8:2015cv03661
Petitioner:
Antonio Moultrie
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Moultrie v. Reynolds
as 9:2015cv00198
Petitioner:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Respondent:
NFN Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley Lee Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD and others
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Newcomb v. Miles et al
as 1:2014cv02048
Plaintiff:
Michael Drew Newcomb, Jr
Defendant:
Louis Miles, Perry Powell, R Moultry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson Enterprises Inc v. Lake Moultrie Construction Inc et al
as 9:2014cv01697
Plaintiff:
Ferguson Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Lake Moultrie Construction Inc, William H Dennis and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
