Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Workman v. McDonald et al
as 6:2018cv01244
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Kevin McDonald, Clement F Haynesworth Courthouse, Courts of Clement F Haynesworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman v. McDonald et al
as 8:2018cv01244
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Kevin McDonald, Clement F Haynesworth Courthouse, Courts of Clement F Haynesworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Clement et al
as 0:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
Sunny Williams
Defendant:
Eva R. Clement, Clement Law Firm, PLLC, Karon Korp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baccus v. Clements et al
as 4:2017cv01851
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Edgar L Clements, III, Von Dean Turbeville, Barry Prosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clement v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 6:2017cv01550
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Clement
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wicks v. Haley et al
as 4:2016cv03652
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Nikki R. Haley, Kenny Boone, E L Clements, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahey v. Clemson University et al
as 8:2016cv02591
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cullen Fahey, III
Defendant:
Clemson University, Clemson University Board of Trustees, James P Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 4:2016cv02527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Jean Toal, Donald W Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Clemson University et al
as 8:2016cv01957
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Clemson University , Clemson University Board of Trustees , James P Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells v. USA
as 4:2016cv01326
Petitioner:
Clement Jeremiah Wells
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
