Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Esperanza Guerrero v. David Moore
as 10-2177
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESPERANZA GUERRERO and JUAN GUERRERO
Plaintiff:
JJG, Minor, MG, Minor, JG, Minor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID L. MOORE, in his official and individual capacity
Defendant:
CHARLIE T. DEANE, in his official capacity, LUIS POTES, in his official and individual capacity, ADAM HURLEY, in his official and individual capacity and others
Party-in-Interest:
THE OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
Softech Worldwide, LLC v. Internet Technology Broadcasting Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
Softech Worldwide, LLC
Defendant:
Internet Technology Broadcasting Corporation , Paul H. Doe, John Does #1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Guerrero et al v. Deane et al
as 1:2009cv01313
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Guerrero, Juan Guerrero, JJG and others
Defendant:
Charlie T. Deane, David L. Moore, Luis Potes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Advantage Energy Marketing Inc v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp
as 09-1945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADVANTAGE ENERGY MARKETING INCORPORATED, Plaintiff Class: Natural Gas Marketing Customers of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation ("TCO") that were damaged by an illegal gas scheme perpetrated by defendants
Defendant - Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
Defendant - None:
COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY, COVE POINT LNG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, COLUMBIA LNG CORPORATION and others
Smith v. Aylor et al
as 1:2008cv01161
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Smith
Defendant:
Glen Aylor, Gene Johnson, Whitney Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Visual Language Interpreting Inc. v. Weinterpret.Net et al
as 1:2007cv02775
Plaintiff:
Visual Language Interpreting Inc.
Defendant:
Weinterpret.Net, David Isaacs Stephenson, Angela K. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
